Overview

Letta (MemGPT)

Rice vs Letta (MemGPT) comparison.

Letta (formerly MemGPT) manages a virtual context window for LLMs.


Comparison

FeatureRiceLetta
Context ManagementNatural decay and attention-based driftExplicit paging/swapping like OS RAM
ControlDeveloper/agent driven via API callsLLM decides when to read/write memory
ComplexityHigh-level SDKsRequires setting up a server runtime

Key Differences

Context Management

Rice uses natural decay and attention-based drift. Context flows organically based on relevance and recency. Letta explicitly pages blocks of text in and out of the context window, similar to how an operating system manages RAM.

Control Model

Rice is developer/agent driven. You call focus(), drift(), commit(), and reminisce() to control memory. Letta is LLM-driven. The LLM itself decides when to read and write memory via function calls.

Setup Complexity

Rice provides high-level SDKs that abstract away the underlying complexity. Letta requires setting up a server that acts as the agent runtime.

Best For

Rice is practical for building defined agent behaviors with deterministic control over skills and natural context flow. Letta is powerful for infinite context simulations where the LLM manages its own memory.